Here is my first attempt this year to rank the bubble teams. I'll be posting my first projection of the field in a couple of minutes...
Teams I cannot see being
left out, that have done just enough to get in:
Missouri
Colorado
Boise State
Iowa State
Temple
Oregon
Teams I think are most
likely in, but I would not be shocked if the committee left them out.
Wichita State- The Shockers
finished 3-2 against the RPI top 50 and second to Creighton in a very
solid Missouri Valley conference. They also are 8-5 against the RPI
top 100. A road win over VCU is the highlight of their resume
overall, though the home win over Creighton is nice as well. They
beat Southern Miss who has strong RPI numbers, but is probably not a
tournament team. They also have a nice win over borderline bubble
team, Iowa.
Oklahoma- Oklahoma probably
has done enough as well. They only went 3-7 against the RPI top 50
but went a strong 6-2 against RPI 51-100. 5 of those 7 RPI top 50
losses are to teams that will be seeded very highly (Gonzaga will
likely be a 1, Kansas could be a 1, Kstate and Oklahoma State will be
be seeded well) and the other two losses were to an Iowa State team
that has likely done enough. Oklahoma has beaten Kansas, Oklahoma
State, and Iowa State, in addition to sweeping borderline bubble team
Baylor. Of course all but one of the two Baylor games was at home.
It's not a perfect resume, but it likely is enough.
Cincinnati- The Bearcats
have had a bunch of chances against the RPI top 5 (13) and have come
away with relatively few wins (4). The result is that UC can point
to 4 really good wins over @Pitt, Marquette, Uconn, and a neutral
floor win over Iowa State, but more often than not UC has failed to
beat tournament caliber teams, particularly at the end of the season.
Cincinnati does have good wins over Villanova and Oregon, both of
which are likely to be tournament teams. UC is 5-2 against Rpi
51-100 which puts them under .500 against the RPI top 100 (at 9-13).
UC has nothing that really qualifies as bad losses, but getting
smoked 3 times down the stretch cannot look good. All in all UC's
tournament resume looks strong enough on its own, but it is not the
same team it was early and there is a ton of room for disagreement
about the Bearcats. The committee's ultimate criteria is whether or
not a team is among the best 37 at large teams and I don't think it
would be unreasonable for a committee to decide UC is not. That
said, I could say that about everyone below them and I think UC's
strong schedule and quality wins are enough, to pull them in.
Cal- Cal's resume comes
largely down to strong play down the stretch and a really good
performance in a fairly deep PAC 10. Cal has some high quality wins
beating Arizona and UCLA. Cal also has a good win over Colorado and
a sweep of Oregon, both of which should be tournament teams. The
weakness in the resume comes from a losing record (3-5) against the
RPI top 50 and the RPI 51-100 (3-5 as well). However, most of those
losses were in conference in a solid, though not great PAC 12. It
seems to me that the Bears have likely done enough to get in.
Last four in:
St Marys- To me St Marys is
a tournament team because I don't think you can watch them and not
believe they are one of the 37 best at large teams. I would actually
put them ahead of anyone in the prior group, because I just think
they are a better basketball team. Advanced statistics tend to back
that up as St Marys was dominant in the WCC against everyone other
than probable 1 seed Gonzaga and KenPom has them as the 25th best
team in the country. That said, of their 26 wins 22 of them are
against teams ranked 100 and below. That is a lot. Their only win
against the RPI top 25 was against Creighton. St Marys is 1-3
against the RPI top 25, but all three losses are to probable one seed
Gonzaga. They are 4-4 against the RPI top 100. St Marys did itself
a real disservice scheduling this poorly in the non-conference
schedule, and the committee could very legitimately leave them out,
BUT I think if you are taking the best 37 there is little doubt St
Marys fits.
La Salle- With wins over
Butler, VCU and Villanova, as well as a strong performance in a deep
Atlantic 10, La Salle has reason to be optimistic that it could earn
a bid. Winning 1 more might be necessary, but given the bubble
status of teams behind them it may not. Getting to the a10 finals
would lock up a bid. La Salle is only 2-3 against the RPI top 50 and
4-4 against 51-100 so there are holes in the resume.
Tennessee- There are a mess
of SEC teams trying to lay claim to an NCAA tournament bid, but I
think of the SEC bubble teams, Tennessee has the strongest resume.
Tennessee is a strong 4-4 against the RPI top 50. It has wins over
Florida, Missouri, and Wichita State, all who will likely be in the
tournament. It also split with bubble team Kentucky and has wins
over borderline bubble teams Umass, Bama and Xavier. It was swept by
borderline bubble team Ole Miss and has two bad losses to Georgia.
In short, Tennessee has performed really well against the probable
tournament teams on its schedule, but there is a lot of muck against
some of the weaker competition. I think as of right now the better
parts of their resume win out, but Tennessee should probably beat
Bama (and of course Miss State before that) if it wants to feel
decent.
Kentucky- 2-4 against the
RPI top 50 and 5-5 against RPI 51-100 does not scream tournament
team. It's two wins against probable tournament teams are both at
home against Missouri and Florida, and both wins came after the Noel
injury. Kentucky also has a split against bubble team Tennessee and
a win over borderline bubble team Ole Miss. Short of a trip to the
SEC finals I think UK will really be sweating on selection Sunday
(and even that would not make their resume really shine). If UK
loses their first tournament game to Arkansas/Vandy winner, their
chances drop significantly.
Others with a chance:
Virginia- This might be the
weirdest resume I have ever seen. Virginia is 2-2 against the Rpi
top 25, 2-0 against 25-50, and 4-1 against 51-100, making it a robust
8-3 against the RPI top 100. Virginia has performed its best against
the best competition on its schedule. Virginia has a win over
probable 1 seed Duke to go with wins over UNC, NC State, Wisconsin
and Tennessee. That is strong stuff. Of course UVA only has an RPI
of 67 having lost 7 games to teams outside of the RPI top 100, one of
which was to RPI 316 Old Dominion. So that is the bad. UVA is also
only 3-9 away from home. UVA's non-conference SOS was 307. This is
the stat where borderline bubble teams have historically gone to die.
When in doubt the committee has penalized teams that schedule poorly
out of conference and rewarded teams that scheduled well. Still
usually the doubt does not include top line wins that are as good as
this Virginia teams. I think it is less than 50-50 they get in
without a win over NC State tomorrow, but with that win the prospects
get to over 50/50. How the committee handles UVA will be
interesting.
Ole Miss- Just some
shameful stuff from Ole Miss down the stretch losing to dreadful
South Carolina and Mississippi State teams. Those losses are now
tacked on to a resume that was already lacking. Ole Miss has a home
win over Missouri, a sweep of bubble Tennessee and a win over
borderline bubble Bama. I don't think that is enough right now, but
Ole Miss has a favorable SEC tourney draw and each game will provide
an opportunity to play their way in. If Ole Miss beats Missouri to
start, they will be in discussion. If seeds hold, could a semi-final
matchup with UK be a play-in game for the Big Dance?
Bama- Similar resume to Ole
Miss, except that its shameful losses were to Auburn, Tulane and
Mercer. 1-4 against the RPI top 50 and wins against quality teams
are not even that impressive having only beaten UK, Tennessee, and
Villanova among possible at large teams. I think Bama has to make
the finals of the SEC tournament to have a shot.
Iowa - Another interesting
resume, where the non-conference SOS is absolutely killer. Iowa did
not do as much as UVA against the top, but it also did not fail as
miserably against the bottom. Iowa is only 1-6 against RPI top 25,
but those losses are to Indiana (2x), Michigan, Michigan State and
Ohio State...that is a murderer's row. Iowa is 3-2 against 26-50 and
1-0 against 51-100 to 100 with wins over Minnesota, Wisconsin,
Illinois and Ohio State. Of course its non-conference SOS is 310 and
15 of its 20 wins are over teams outside the RPI top 100. I don't
even think a win over Michigan State will be enough, I think Iowa
must make the Big 10 finals (beating OSU along the way). That said,
beat Michigan State and the discussion gets more interesting. For
now Iowa is out.
Middle Tennessee State-
They have a 29 RPI and a win over Ole Miss. They do not have much
else. I don't think they get in, I don't think they should get in,
but they would not be the least accomplished team to sneak in (See
Utah State/Air Force 2006).
Louisiana Tech- It's easy
for La Tech, win the WAC and make the big dance. Their resume
deserves a brief mention, only because this type of team has snuck in
on insanely rare occasions in the past (situations where I believe
the committee has got it wrong). Their one top 50 win is over
Southern Miss. They only have 3 wins over the RPI top 100. Sorry,
that SHOULD not cut it.
Baylor- Their win over
Kansas suddenly made things a little more interesting, but this
resume is thin enough that there is plenty of more work to do.
Baylor is only 3-10 over the RPI top 50 (though 2-0 against 51-100).
It's 3 wins are very solid over Kansas, Oklahoma State and Kentucky.
A trip to the Big 12 finals would give them 5 top 50 RPI wins and
would likely include additional wins over Kansas State and Oklahoma
State. That would put them squarely on the bubble.
Akron- 1-2 against the RPI
top 50 and 3-1 against RPI 51-100, in addition to a really dominating
year in the MAC...Could that have been enough? Maybe. After the
suspension of one of its best players, probably not. The problem is,
Akron's wins simply were not good enough to overcome any slip-ups in
the MAC, much less 2 in its final 3 games. Akron now must win the
MAC to get in... I think.
Umass- The 1-6 record
against the RPI top 50 is not good, however, the 7-2 record against
RPI 51-100 is very solid. Umass is one of those teams like most of
below the cut, that has a lot of work to do, but will have
opportunities to do it. It's best win, however, is against bubble,
La Salle and that is just a really lacking resume. A run to the
finals that includes wins over Temple and VCU would make their resume
a lot more interesting, however.
Xavier- Another weird
resume, that really illustrates how far Xavier has come throughout
the season. This was a bad team early, but I am 90% convinced right
now they are one of the 37 best at large teams. Of course entire
body of work matters, and Xavier's resume is not that of a best 37
at-large team at the moment. Xavier has 15 losses and is 0-5 against
RPI 51-100. Of course it is also 5-3 against the RPI top 50, which
is really good (like comparable to 6/7 seed good). If they beat VCU
and Temple on their way to A 10 championship birth, they will get
their RPI top 50 record up to 7-3 which would be stellar. Could that
be enough to outweigh all the bad?